GOP lawmaker files extreme anti-abortion “heartbeat” bill in Florida House

Florida Phoenix

Pensacola House Republican Mike Hill has filed restrictive anti-abortion legislation that would prohibit a pregnant woman from getting an abortion in Florida if a physician detects a fetal heartbeat. The proposal calls for physicians to conduct an abdominal ultrasound to test for a fetal heartbeat on any woman seeking an abortion. If a heartbeat is detected, it would prohibit the abortion from happening and doctors would face felony charges if they performed the procedure.

A fetal heartbeat can be detected as early as six weeks – so early that a woman may not even know she is pregnant.

This is the first time a so-called “heartbeat” anti-abortion bill has been proposed in Florida. The law is similar to other bills introduced in Congress and at least ten states over the past decade that are seen as a coordinated challenge to the landmark U.S. law that legalized abortion. None have become laws, either because they didn’t receive sufficient support in their respective state legislatures or because they have been blocked by the courts.

On the campaign trail this summer, newly-elected Governor Ron DeSantis said he would sign such legislation if it came to his desk.

“This is just another attempt by a Florida politician – we’ve seen it before – at criminalizing doctors and interfering in women’s private medical decisions,” said Laura Goodhue, the executive director for the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates. “It’s clearly unconstitutional if they were to pass this bill into law.”

A series of laws that would reduce the availability of abortions in Florida have been passed in recent years by the GOP-led Legislature, but the Florida Supreme Court has blocked nearly all of them.

However, the court may look at such cases in a different light by the time the Florida legislative session begins in the spring. That’s because three liberal-leaning justices on the court stepped down this week after reaching the mandatory retirement age, opening up seats for the Republican governor to fill the court with more conservative justices. He began that process this week by selecting conservative jurist Barbara Logoa to succeed R. Fred Lewis on the bench.

The bill says the penalty for a doctor performing an abortion after detecting a fetal heartbeat would be a third-degree felony, which could carry penalties from two to five years in prison and fines up to $5,000.

The bill does allow for an exception; it says that two physicians must certify in writing that “in reasonable medical judgement,” the termination of the pregnancy is necessary to save the woman’s life or avert a serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a “major bodily function.” If two physicians aren’t available, the bill says that only one physician needs to certify.

“The exceptions for the life and health of a woman are very narrowly defined, so there could be a lot of scenarios where a woman’s health could be at risk,  but the doctor, because they could be convicted of a third-degree felony, would be afraid of providing the proper care that they’ve been trained to do,” said Goodhue.

Another abortion-related bill was filed on Thursday by Central Florida Democrat Amy Mercado. It would enact penalties on people who physically threaten women entering abortion clinics. It would also prohibit intentionally damaging, destroying a reproductive health care facility.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports legalized abortion, six states and the District of Columbia currently have laws against intimidating patients entering a clinic or staff who provide reproductive health services. Three of the states prohibit property damage to facilities that provide reproductive health services.

Mitch Perry
Mitch Perry has spent the past 18 years covering news and politics in the Sunshine State, most recently with He worked for five years as the political editor of Creative Loafing in Tampa, and before that he was the assistant news director at WMNF radio, where he served as creator/anchor/producer of the hour-long WMNF Evening News. A San Francisco native, Mitch began his career at KPFA Radio in Berkeley in the 1990's.


  1. Many of these legislators are much more concerned about controlling women than saving babies. If you follow their voting records one finds votes against sex education, Planned Parenthood and protecting women’s health clinics. I would surmise Mr. Hill is more interested in the conquest of female genitalia activity and pandering to his base than the rights of women or the fetus.

  2. What determins a life? Are you killing a bird if you smash the egg before it hatches? People can be brain dead but still have a heartbeat. People can be hooked up to machines to breath for them and pacemakers to keep their heart beating. And its still a crime to kill those people as it would be to say all cancer patients should be killed because its not worth the time or money to keep them alive. Yet women will abort a baby just because they are to busy to have one or dont have the money to take care of one.

    Under extreme circumstances that cause a mother to have deathly health complications should there be intervention. Abortions should never have been legalized in the first place. Where woman of all ages had the right to be a murderer and be able to get away with it scott free. Also giving doctors free permission to kill as many humans as they want to by explaining all the difficulties of a pregnancy to help convince them to choose murder over the gift of life.

  3. You think that a bill is “extreme” because it forbids stopping the heartbeat of another human being, which you have neatly categorized as something other-than-human due to stage of development. The “extreme” label belongs to you, methinks.

    And to the poster above me, no legislator cares about controlling women. Votes against sex education mean votes against government teaching morality (and abortion advocates sexualizing children to sell abortions); Planned Parenthood as a private organization needs no state money; women’s clinics need no more defense than any other establishment. You, sir, are an abortion supremacist and are unhappy that Hill is drying up your gravy train.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here